Foot & Soccer Soccer Match Reports, Football News 
Myles Lewis-Skelly of Arsenal was proven a crimson card for a foul on Matt Doherty of Wolverhampton Wanderers (Photograph by Shaun Botterill/Getty Photos)
Howard Webb has admitted that Myles Lewis-Skelly’s crimson card in opposition to Wolves was finally the flawed determination – however he nonetheless defended the officers concerned.
In controversial vogue, the Arsenal teenager was despatched off within the first half of their 1-0 win in January after referee Michael Oliver confirmed him a straight crimson, a call backed by VAR official Darren England.
Mikel Arteta criticised the choice whereas pundit Micah Richards described it as “the worst determination in Premier League historical past.” In the meantime, Premier League and Newcastle United legend Alan Shearer slammed the horrible determination by the referee.
Arsenal later appealed the crimson card, and it was overturned, however they have been hit with a £65,000 advantageous after their gamers confronted Oliver in protest of the choice.
The controversy resurfaced throughout Tuesday’s episode of Match Officers: Mic’d Up on Sky Sports activities, the place the audio between Oliver and the VAR crew was made public.
“From the outset, we would like a yellow card on this scenario,” mentioned Webb. “The referee noticed Lewis-Skelly transfer towards an opponent with no actual probability of enjoying the ball, elevating his foot and making excessive contact. The opponent went down, and from Oliver’s perspective, it regarded like critical foul play. The VAR reviewed it however didn’t really feel it was ‘clearly and clearly flawed’ because the contact was fairly excessive on the leg.”
PGMOL chief Howard Webb explains his ideas on Myles Lewis-Skelly’s sending off in opposition to Wolves earlier than the three-match ban was then overturned. pic.twitter.com/NJe30C1ilO
— Sky Sports activities Premier League (@SkySportsPL) February 18, 2025
Howard Webb explains why VAR didn’t intervene
Nonetheless, Webb identified that critical foul play requires “extreme pressure or brutality” – and wasn’t the case right here. “The contact was glancing – it didn’t totally go into the leg, it glanced off and got here down onto the foot. That’s why most individuals now agree this fell in need of critical foul play. Whereas there have been arguments for a crimson, there have been extra the explanation why it ought to have been a yellow,” he added.
Regardless of acknowledging the error, Webb defended the officers: “VAR didn’t wish to re-referee the sport. They solely intervene if a call is clearly flawed, and within the second, they felt this didn’t meet that threshold. I’ve heard folks name this a horrendous mistake, however it’s not! I perceive why the referee noticed it that manner in real-time.”
The VAR audio confirmed that Oliver initially deemed the problem critical foul play, with VAR checking if the choice was “clearly and clearly flawed.” The assistant VAR famous that Lewis-Skelly’s studs first made contact close to the Achilles earlier than glancing down on the foot. Ultimately, they upheld the crimson card.
“We hear, we give suggestions, and we attempt to align choices with what’s anticipated within the sport,” Webb mentioned.
