Atalanta ahead Ademola Lookman has publicly criticized supervisor Gian Piero Gasperini for his post-match feedback following Atalanta’s Champions League elimination. Lookman expressed his disappointment and harm at Gasperini’s evaluation of him as “one of many worst penalty takers” he’s ever seen.
This rebuke follows Atalanta’s 3-1 residence defeat to Membership Brugge, leading to a 5-2 combination loss and elimination from the Champions League. Lookman’s response highlights the strained relationship between participant and supervisor and the depth of feelings following a big defeat.
Gasperini’s criticism of Lookman centered on his penalty miss in opposition to Membership Brugge. Lookman, having scored Atalanta’s solely objective, took the penalty himself, regardless of teammates Charles De Ketelaere and Mateo Retegui being out there.
His missed penalty, saved by Simon Mignolet, prompted Gasperini’s sharp rebuke. Lookman responded with an announcement on Instagram, expressing his disappointment and emphasizing his dedication and dedication to the membership. He additionally famous his historical past of dealing with challenges throughout his time at Atalanta, implying a long-standing concern between the 2.
The penalty incident and Lookman’s renalty document
The penalty incident occurred in an important second of the match. Lookman’s resolution to take the penalty, regardless of his less-than-perfect penalty-taking document (4 targets, two misses in six makes an attempt), fueled Gasperini’s criticism.
The supervisor’s give attention to the penalty miss additional highlighted the extraordinary pressure and disappointment following a big defeat, showcasing his frustration and rapid response to a key second through the match. Lookman’s try was a panenka, a famously dangerous method to penalty-taking.
Gasperini additionally criticized Atalanta captain Rafael Toloi for receiving a crimson card late within the match. The mix of those essential feedback and the general disappointment following the Champions League exit created additional pressure inside the membership. Lookman’s public response means that there could also be an ongoing battle between participant and supervisor.