La Liga president Javier Tebas not too long ago spoke intimately with The Goal, the place he addressed a number of points, together with his ongoing disputes with Actual Madrid.
Nonetheless, a key focus of his remarks was the monetary scenario at FC Barcelona. Attributable to La Liga’s monetary rules, the Catalan membership has confronted extreme restrictions within the switch market, stopping them from working freely.
Tebas acknowledged considerations surrounding the membership’s try to fulfill the 1:1 spending rule by the sale of VIP seats. Whereas this association helped Barcelona register some gamers, La Liga has not but validated the registrations of Dani Olmo and Pau Víctor.
Their skill to play has solely been attainable as a result of a short lived ruling from the Greater Sports activities Council.
Asking for truthful decision
Tebas defined that Barcelona had appealed La Liga’s preliminary resolution concerning their monetary manoeuvres. The league had positioned strict situations on these offers, demanding that 40% of the agreed quantity be paid upfront in money.
Javier Tebas has requested for a good decision. (Picture by OSCAR DEL POZO/AFP by way of Getty Photos)
Upon additional assessment, La Liga’s Financial Management Committee discovered irregularities within the deal. One of many corporations concerned had a registered capital of simply €3,000 and was run by a person with an obscure background.
“This challenge have to be clarified properly. FC Barcelona appealed to the interior our bodies of LaLiga as a result of we had denied them or put a really excessive assure in these contracts. They needed to advance 40% of the contracts in money,” he started saying.
“Within the inner appeals filed by Barcelona, LaLiga’s Financial Management Committee utilized the validation rule and located that one of many corporations concerned had a share capital of solely €3,000 and was run by an unknown particular person, with a number of companies of doubtful origin.”
La Liga flagged this partnership as questionable for the reason that reference to Barcelona dated again to Could 2024.
Tebas emphasised that the matter had been escalated to the related inner our bodies and the Greater Sports activities Council, insisting that this was a part of La Liga’s customary procedures somewhat than a focused motion towards Barcelona.
“All this was already within the writings we offered. This partnership had a relationship with Barça since Could 2024, so it isn’t one thing new.
“We’ve transferred this data to our inner our bodies and to the CSD in our written submissions. We aren’t doing something particular with the CSD; that is a part of our regular course of.”
The Negreira case
Tebas has shared his ideas on the Negreira case. (Picture by Arnold Jerocki/Getty Photos For Sportel)
Relating to the continued Negreira case, which is but to be absolutely investigated, Tebas sought to distinguish between the authorized elements in play. He famous that Barcelona, as an establishment, may face accusations of sports activities corruption.
“We’ve to distinguish the crimes which might be being investigated. Barça, as a authorized entity, could possibly be accused of sports activities corruption.”
La Liga has actively pushed for the investigation to proceed, believing there’s sufficient proof to justify a proper trial.
The league argues that there are enough indications that Barcelona engaged in improper conduct, however the severity of any potential sentence will rely upon the court docket’s findings.
“From La Liga, actually, we have now requested for the investigation to be accomplished as a result of we consider that there’s enough proof to go to oral trial. We would like the pending proof to be completed and for the case to maneuver ahead,” he mentioned.
In the meantime, different accusations, similar to mismanagement and doc forgery, are primarily directed at people somewhat than the membership itself.
“We consider that there are indications for Barça to be convicted of sports activities corruption, though the extent of the sentence will rely upon what is set within the trial.
“As for the crimes of disloyal administration and doc forgery, these are extra linked to people who may have dedicated them.”
The implications for Barcelona
Tebas refused to speak a lot concerning the implications. (Picture by Arnold Jerocki/Getty Photos For Sportel)
Tebas additionally mentioned the potential penalties if Barcelona have been discovered responsible of sports activities corruption.
He reaffirmed La Liga’s stance that the funds made to former referee official Negreira have been meant to affect key footballing selections, together with promotions and relegations.
“We’ve requested that the case go to trial as a result of we consider that there’s enough proof to find out that FC Barcelona dedicated against the law of sports activities corruption with, not simply the mere provide, however the fee to Negreira with the intention of influencing promotions and relegations.”
From the league’s perspective, this alone constitutes sports activities corruption and must be delivered to trial. Tebas has beforehand expressed this opinion in numerous boards, together with La Vanguardia, and maintains that the proof helps authorized motion.
“That, in our opinion, is already sufficient to contemplate that there’s sports activities corruption. I’ve mentioned it in a number of boards, together with one in La Vanguardia in Barcelona, and I consider that there are enough indications to provoke an oral trial.”
Relegation shouldn’t be an possibility
Tebas mentioned Barcelona is not going to be relegated. (Picture by Carlos Alvarez/Getty Photos)
Regardless of these robust statements, Tebas clarified that even when Barcelona have been convicted, the membership wouldn’t face relegation from La Liga.
He defined that the present Sports activities Legislation has a three-year statute of limitations on such instances, which means any administrative punishment is legally not possible.
Whereas La Liga should comply with the present authorized framework, Tebas reiterated that there is no such thing as a concrete proof that Barcelona instantly influenced referees by monetary means.
“I don’t make the sports activities legal guidelines; I’ve to adjust to what the Sports activities Legislation establishes.
“On this case, the statute of limitations for crimes is three years, and we can not invent a unique statute of limitations. So, no, there could be no administrative lower because of this,” he famous.
Supply: Mundo Deportivo